In today's world, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Whether due to its historical relevance, its impact on contemporary society or its influence on popular culture, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. Over the years, 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles has been the subject of countless research, discussions and analysis, leading to a greater understanding of its complexities and the identification of multiple perspectives on it. In this article, we will explore some key aspects related to 2010 ATP World Tour Finals – Singles, with the aim of delving into its meaning and scope in different contexts.
Singles | |
---|---|
2010 ATP World Tour Finals | |
Champion | Roger Federer |
Runner-up | Rafael Nadal |
Score | 6–3, 3–6, 6–1 |
Roger Federer defeated Rafael Nadal in the final, 6–3, 3–6, 6–1 to win the singles tennis title at the 2010 ATP World Tour Finals. It was his fifth Tour Finals title. Nadal was attempting to complete the career Super Slam.
Tomáš Berdych was the only player to make his debut at the event.
Nikolay Davydenko was the reigning champion, but did not qualify this year.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 77 | 3 | 78 | |||||||||
5 | Andy Murray | 65 | 6 | 66 | |||||||||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 3 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||
2 | Roger Federer | 6 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||
2 | Roger Federer | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
3 | Novak Djokovic | 1 | 4 |
Nadal | Djokovic | Berdych | Roddick | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
1 | Rafael Nadal | 7–5, 6–2 | 7–6(7–3), 6–1 | 3–6, 7–6(7–5), 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–1 | 42–30 | 1 | |
3 | Novak Djokovic | 5–7, 2–6 | 6–3, 6–3 | 6–2, 6–3 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 31–24 | 2 | |
6 | Tomáš Berdych | 6–7(3–7), 1–6 | 3–6, 3–6 | 7–5, 6–3 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 26–33 | 3 | |
8 | Andy Roddick | 6–3, 6–7(5–7), 4–6 | 2–6, 3–6 | 5–7, 3–6 | 0–3 | 1–6 | 29–41 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Federer | Söderling | Murray | Ferrer | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
2 | Roger Federer | 7–6(7–5), 6–3 | 6–4, 6–2 | 6–1, 6–4 | 3–0 | 6–0 | 37–20 | 1 | |
4 | Robin Söderling | 6–7(5–7), 3–6 | 2–6, 4–6 | 7–5, 7–5 | 1–2 | 2–4 | 29–35 | 3 | |
5 | Andy Murray | 4–6, 2–6 | 6–2, 6–4 | 6–2, 6–2 | 2–1 | 4–2 | 30–22 | 2 | |
7 | David Ferrer | 1–6, 4–6 | 5–7, 5–7 | 2–6, 2–6 | 0–3 | 0–6 | 19–38 | 4 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.