Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts

If there is something that has always fascinated us, it is Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts. Since time immemorial, Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts has been an object of study, admiration and debate. Whether for its impact on history, its influence on culture, or its relevance in today's society, Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts continues to be a topic of great interest to academics, professionals, and the curious alike. In this article, we will thoroughly explore all aspects related to Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts, from its origins to its impact on the modern world. Through a thorough and enriching analysis, we hope to expand our knowledge and understanding of Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts, and perhaps even discover new facets that surprise us. Join us on this fascinating journey through Wikipedia:Consensus dos and don'ts, and together we will unravel its mysteries and meanings. Do not miss it!

Wikipedia information page

This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia:Consensus. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting.

Shortcut WP:CONDD

Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental model for editorial decision-making: when it doesn't work, nothing else does either.

In situations involving consensus:

DO: Be familiar with relevant policies, guidelines, and past discussions Follow the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Challenge consensus at the right venue(s) Neutrally ask for more opinions when needed Take intractable disputes to the right dispute resolution process	DON'T: Don't pretend a consensus you disagree with doesn't exist! Don't use local consensus to ignore wider consensus Don't close contentious discussions that you participated in Don't canvass for support of your position Don't use tendentious editing to get your way

See also

• Simple rule set