In today's world, Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion has become a topic of increasing interest. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance in the academic field or its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion has positioned itself as a topic of constant debate and reflection. From its origins to the present, Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion has been the subject of study and analysis by experts in different areas, who have tried to decipher its multiple facets and understand its importance in the development of humanity. In this article, we will explore the different perspectives from which Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion can be approached, and we will analyze its relevance in the contemporary world.
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).
This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.
Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. I intend to work on this page now. Apologies for not making edits to this draft on a more consistent basis over the past few months. Thank you. 70.22.239.17 (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)19:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm ZYX001, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ZYX001 (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@ZYX001:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
For a real-life reason, I am planning to take an extended wikibreak and before that, the draft should probably be completed and moved to mainspace. —Taku (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)19:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:Mercy Gilbert Medical Center. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the PROD. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)19:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@Ninjastrikers:Done – as a non-free file deleted as orphaned, this has been restored upon request. Please note that the file needs to be de-orphaned within 7 days, otherwise it may be deleted again per CSD F5. Once the file is in use on an article, please remove the {{di-orphaned fair use}} tag. UtherSRG(talk)19:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Wikibro4, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Wikibro4 (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@Wikibro4:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)19:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, CactusWriter (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Few pages that were created to report results of Iranian athletic championship had been deleted with out discussion in Dec 1 2023. The editor request for deletion by this concern: "The only references provided are to primary sources, which don't establish the subject's notability. A quick search before nomination didn't turn up anything." I think although there were enough diverse resources for these athletics championship records , as the events news and resources are all in Farsi language and not English the editor saw the resources as only primary (while news agency reports and even news agency photo report were cited at the end of these wiki pages). I think existence of such pages helps to have diversity in the fields such as athletic and track fields which usually only you can find records from very developed and few western countries on Wikipedia. The pages included some information that can be very appreciated when you want to compare results of athletic records from different countries. I think they should at least initiate a discussion before deleting these pages that I recently saw have been deleted in Dec 2023 as I was trying to create new page for this year Iranian athletic championship results. The deleted pages include 2021 and 2022 as well-Thank You —Farbod Farbod (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
@Monica Woods Writer:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T20:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 00:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)01:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm GreenVolvox, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. GreenVolvox (talk) 04:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @GreenVolvox:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Abidayub786, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Abidayub786 (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
The page was deleted for lack of references. I can provide the related authentic references and also set the tone of article as required. —Abidayub786 (talk) 04:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Abidayub786, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Abidayub786 (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qasim Ali Shah (3rd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. @Abidayub786:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm TheChronikler7, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. TheChronikler7 (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @TheChronikler7:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, please restore the article to a draft or to my work page. The article can be improved and rewritten for future successful republication. Thanks! —Mooon FR (talk) 08:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Mooon FR:Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Sewell Wright, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, OwenX (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. UtherSRG(talk)12:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
File:WLLQ La Grande 1530-1000-1220-910-1370 logo.png
@Mo Garen:Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Fastily (talk·contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Hi, I'm Aiomari, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Aiomari (talk) 13:15, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Aiomari:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)13:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was used as a source for a Wikisource text, see s:Talk:Last Will of James Squire of Kissing Point. I would like to ask if it could be made available somewhere so that it can be checked if it is in compliance with Wikisource guidelines and thus worth of being uploaded either to Wikisource or to Commons. Thanks. —Jan Kameníček (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks very much. It is being discussed in Wikisource now and I will nominate it to be re-deleted once the discussion is finished. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Extraordinary Writ: The case in Wikisource has been resolved and this file is not needed anymore. It is just some unsourced and imprecise transcription of a document and another document containing the original text was uploaded to Commons instead, so it can be re-deleted. I do not think it is necessary to WP:PROD it, imo it can be speedied right away. Thanks very much for help! --Jan Kameníček (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Firekiino, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Firekiino (talk) 14:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Firekiino:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Reconrabbit, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Reconrabbit16:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Reconrabbit:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sspringett, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Sspringett (talk) 21:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Sspringett: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 21:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sourcetostar, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Sourcetostar (talk) 21:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
@Sourcetostar:Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 21:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. see Draft:ICC FraudNet@Sourcetostar: you should have been asking for the draft which was not deleted as advertising. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie D'Souza. This page was deleted because of the assertion of user Dclemens1971 that the article subject had not received significant coverage. I disagree with this assertion. There are references to multiple articles from independent
sources, and in addition Jamie has been invited as a guest on multiple independent podcasts which are also referenced in the article. I am aware that the current list of mentions and references is still relatively small, but the best way to grow that is for the page to exist and for other editors to improve the article over time. —JTA (talk) 21:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Robo engineer, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Robo engineer (talk) 03:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Robo engineer:Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
Hi, I'm Morrispetris, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Morrispetris (talk) 04:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Morrispetris:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 07:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Wmydaughter, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Wmydaughter (talk) 06:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Wmydaughter:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 07:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm ESATEV, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ESATEV (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@ESATEV:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)14:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Zeus2934, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Zeus2934 (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Zeus2934:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)14:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I am not the creator of the draft. I am requesting the undeletion to see if there is anything that needs to be saved. —Taku (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)16:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I am not the creator of the draft. According to Google, this notion seems to be a valid encyclopedic topic. So, either it needs to be developed or merged into existing articles. —Taku (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)16:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
According to Google, this is a real thing so either it needs to be developed or merged into existing articles (anyway the undeletion is required). —Taku (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)16:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t know if this is notable enough for a standalone article but can still be part of the existing ones, I suppose. —Taku (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)16:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The notability is not clear but the deleted content might still need to be merged into some existing articles. —Taku (talk) 15:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)16:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)16:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. UtherSRG(talk)16:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@UtherSRG: I did not make such a pledge (specifically because I didn’t know if I had such time at the time of request). As I noted above, the topic appeared to be notable so the draft still needs to be developed. — Taku (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)20:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a notable topic (according to a quick Google search I just did). The theorem is already mentioned in Mary Cartwright. So, if the draft is short, maybe it can be merged into it. —Taku (talk) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)16:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)16:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. UtherSRG(talk)16:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@UtherSRG: There was no such pledge. Although there was no activity, that does not mean the further work that I mentioned above is not needed. —- Taku (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)20:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Journohelper, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Journohelper (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Journohelper:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)16:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm ArborChamp, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ArborChamp (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@ArborChamp:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)20:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much. I would love you to take a look and let me know if you think it is ready to be submitted. I was nervous to submit it before ArborChamp (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
@Miraclepine:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)20:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 20:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)20:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
FScript is still relevant since new versions have been developed that allow for compatibility with the newest MACOS systems, the author specified the reason for its deletion was that she could only find a mention of it in a book, and that is a gross exageration —131.170.239.12 (talk) 20:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as Draft:F-Script (programming language). This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the PROD. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. - UtherSRG(talk)21:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Nicebear12345, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Nicebear12345 (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
This editor has recreated this draft, just a one word sentence or less, three times already. I was almost going to protect the page. I don't think they have the interest or skills to actually write a draft article. LizRead!Talk!22:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
@LightNightLights:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@LightNightLights:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@SeychellesInsider:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Jsackley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Jan Sackley (talk) 15:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Jsackley:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)15:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
According to the Google search, this is most likely not notable but the draft may contain some content that needs to be merged. —Taku (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Иованъ:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 17:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm AdarshVerma0, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. AdarshVerma0 (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@AdarshVerma0:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T17:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I see. It seems that both the article that we have and the draft are very low-effort pieces. I don't know what to do about this. BD2412T18:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minolta STF 135mm f/2.8 T4.5. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I just saw that our article on the Minolta Smooth-Trans-Focus lens was PRODed. I ask it to be restored. This lens is highly notable for being based on a unique optical design utilizing an apodization filter. It is highly regarded by photographers as a special portrait and landscape lens, and there have even been photographers who switched to the Minolta/Konica Minolta/Sony A-mount system because no such lens is available in other systems. (Actually, in recent years, there are a few more similar designs, but Minolta's pioneering design originated decades ago.) The nominator obviously has no clue about photography and didn't do the necessary homework to nominate the article for deletion. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, BD2412. I remember that there have been a large number of redirects into this article as part of the infrastructure we have created around articles about photographic lenses. This was a particular pain to create due to all the name variations and the special "" characters used in the offical name of this lens and the unique T-stop apertures used by this lens. Presumably, these redirects were deleted as well when this article was deleted. Can you please restore them as well, as they were part of the very carefully created infrastructure around this and other lens articles. After all these years, it would take a tremendeous amount of time to recreate them all manually. Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I've undeleted all of the redirects. This wouldn't have happened if there had been multiple secondary sources supporting these claims. When I saw it when reviewing all articles tagged with {{correct title}} it looked like a clear WP:NOTDIR violation. * Pppery *it has begun...00:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Anatroccolo blu, and I would like to request the undeletion of this Creste dei calciatori deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Anatroccolo blu Anatroccolo blu (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Anatroccolo blu:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm 00A86B, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 00A86B (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@00A86B:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm McFartDoogles, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it, a few more sources have popped up regarding this individual now, Thank you. McFartDoogles (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @McFartDoogles:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Timlikesspace, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Timlikesspace (talk) 02:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Timlikesspace:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandhan Mutual Fund (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Liz (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. DMacks (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
You can ask at Liz's talk page. I don't think she monitors her pings regularly, but checks the talk page. As suggested at the Teahouse, you should have participated in the deletion discussions. Also note the give your three best sources next time advice. Jay 💬12:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Starklinson, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Starklinson (talk) 10:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Melvinx100, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Melvinx100 (talk) 12:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Adelbibi93, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Adelbibi93 (talk) 15:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
I will be providing all references. I would rather not start from square zero again. I am not asking to have it published, I am asking for an access to the previous content so as to start editing, complementing, and previous and new sources. Adelbibi93 (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm CHUPACHIEP, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. CHUPACHIEP (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
@CHUPACHIEP:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
@Nishidharmacenter:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
@Closed Limelike Curves:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)23:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm TheRain07, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. TheRain07 (talk) 00:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @TheRain07:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Biggollden, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Biggollden (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Biggollden:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm DSP2092, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. DSP2092 (👤, 🗨️) 15:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@DSP2092:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
This draft just got deleted but I still need the access to the draft to review it (if not to develop it). For example, because I am not the author of the draft, I have no idea what it is about. —Taku (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
According to a quick Google search, this theorem seems to be notable enough for Wikipedia (so we need to develop the article on it). —Taku (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T16:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Todd Stallworth, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Todd Stallworth Dkscsoccer (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Dkscsoccer:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Fermiboson:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Christiangamer7:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Tracklan2, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Tracklan2 (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
@Tracklan2: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 18:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)