Today we are going to talk about Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items, a topic that has captured the attention of many people in the last decade. Since its emergence, Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items has generated great interest in different areas, from science to popular culture. In this article, we will explore the different aspects of Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items, from its impact on society to the latest research on the topic. We will discover how Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items has evolved over time and how it has influenced people in different ways. Additionally, we will examine some of the controversies and debates that have arisen around Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items, and how these discussions have shaped our understanding of the topic. In summary, this article will offer a comprehensive and broad overview of Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items, providing readers with a solid and up-to-date understanding of this fascinating topic.
To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, Wikipedia talk:Cascade-protected items/content redirects here. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 1460 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm requesting that the following pages please have their cascading protection removed:
...Reason being is that Wikipedia:Introduction was recently repurposed with its former content being moved to Wikipedia:Introduction (historical). In response, all subpages of Wikipedia:Introduction are being adjusted/fixed to match the content at Wikipedia:Introduction (historical), considering that Wikipedia:Introduction is no longer the proper parent page for the subpages mentioned in this request. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I assume "Ceranium's stuff" was meant to refer to Cenarium (talk · contribs) (referring to the historic User:Cenarium/Protected templates) but as you can see the username is misspelled. Please swap the "r" and the "n". Thank you. —Uzume (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
It looks to me like all system messages have been migrated to the new-style padlocks. As such, I'd like to remove the old-style padlocks File:Padlock.svg and File:Padlock-blue.svg from this list. Any objections? Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you replace File:Folder Hexagonal Icon.svg () with File:Symbol category class.svg (). While the link count states the folder icon has over 1.13 million file links, this is wrong and I can't imagine it is over 100k. The icon was replaced a while ago with "Symbol category class.svg" which currently has over 927k file links. Terasail 14:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove {{cite article}}, per WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_3#Template:Cite_article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
I think File:Treffpunkt.svg should be uploaded and protected locally. At the risk of spilling the WP:BEANS, it is not even protected on Commons. This is currently used in {{centralized discussion}}, which is certainly a WP:HIGHRISK template. While that template is only semi-protected so editors can list discussions, the helper template that directly links to the image (Template:Centralized discussion/core) is template protected. The image is linked to more than 5,500 times, which is more than some of the images listed under #Other known high-risk images. Thoughts? HouseBlastertalk 21:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove File:Lock icon blue.gif from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected_items/content#Used_in_interface_and_message_boxes. It's not been in use for years, and it was deleted locally in 2017. --rchard2scout (talk) 11:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I have recreated the list of the top 100 files according to Special:MostLinkedFiles. Please replace Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content#The 50 most-used images and Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content#The 51-100 most used images with the equivalent sections in my sandbox. Along with this please also protect and create a local copy (With {{Keep local high-risk}}) of the new entries to this list, which are the following:
Terasail 02:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
This file claims it's cascade protected by this page, but I can't find it here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add {{#invoke:lockbox|lock|Template:Blocked text}} as this message is used in the MediaWiki interface (MediaWiki:Blockedtext). Awesome Aasim 01:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This edit request to Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the shortcut on the subpage from WP:CASC (the main page) to WP:CPI/C (a shortcut I juts created for the subpage). Awesome Aasim 14:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)